The crowdfunding campaign for VersionPress has concluded and unfortunately, they’ve come up short. The team raised just 45% of the $30,000 funding goal. Despite not hitting the goal, Borek Bernard has announced they will self-fund the rest of the development while leaving open the possibility to work with a third-party sponsor. The first version is expected to be released in the fourth quarter of 2014.
If you funded the project, you should have received an email with instructions explaining how to request a refund if you’d like your money back. If you don’t request a refund, you’ll be given a receipt from VersionPress next week.
While the campaign was not financially successful, it validated VersionPress as a good idea. As Bernard explains,
I can’t tell you how encouraging all this is. If we learned something from the campaign it’s that it is certainly not just about fund raising. We received a lot of positive energy, some very good feedback and I have had many interesting conversations with people who deeply cared about VersionPress. We couldn’t just let it go.
Campaign Started Off On A Rocky Note
When I initially wrote about the project, several readers questioned what license the project would have. Some advocated they wouldn’t financially support a WordPress plugin that was not licensed under the GPL or a compatible license. A few days after publishing the article, VersionPress announced they would license their plugin under the GPL.
The Issue Of Trust
Unlike Kickstarter or Indiegogo, VersionPress opted to self-host their crowdfunding campaign. This is a practice not commonly seen in the WordPress community. This also raised issues of whether or not the developers could be trusted.
Kickstarter is open to backers all over the world but project creation is only available to those in the following countries:
- New Zealand
Since Bernard and Jan Voráček reside in the Czech Republic, they were unable to use Kickstarter. They opted not to use Indiegogo or other crowdfunding platforms because any such platform shouldn’t be the primary reason to fund a project. By self-hosting the campaign, they were able to control the message, branding, and free themselves of limitations other platforms have.
One of the primary benefits to using Kickstarter is that it’s an established entity that has the backers best interests in mind. Backers are less likely to be taken advantage of versus a self-hosted campaign.
How Could the Campaign Have Gone Better?
I think you only have one shot to obtain funding if you go the crowdfunding route so it’s important to have all your ducks in a row. When I discovered the project and campaign, I noticed it was already under the 20 day mark instead of the full month. The campaign started late and those were valuable days lost.
Not being clear and decisive up front about which license the project would have hurt the campaign. As I was one of the first to write about the campaign, the focus turned towards the licensing issue versus spreading the word to as many people as possible.
When I donated $20 to the project, there were no options to tell my friends and followers. I had to do this manually. I think this is one of the key pieces to the lack of funding for this project. When I see a lot of people in my Twitter timeline with automated tweets that they just donated to a project, I take notice. If anything, I research the project to determine why so many of my followers are giving them money. Social donations also help to prevent campaign founders from being too aggressive when asking for funds since the social interactions of multiple individuals are doing the advertising.
Looking Ahead To VersionPress 1.0
I’m happy the team has decided to continue on with the project despite not hitting their funding goal. It’s a great idea and no other plugin that I know of has the proposed feature set of VersionPress, especially the tight integration with the database. During the campaign, I heard someone describe the plugin as The Undo Button For WordPress. The slogan has a nice ring to it and does a better job of explaining what VersionPress is to the common user.
Are you happy that VersionPress will be a reality despite not hitting their goal? What do you think they could have done differently to reach their funding goal?