Matt Mullenweg’s Ecosystem Thinking for Open Source Success 

WordCamp US 2024 is in full swing, and Matt Mullenweg, co-founder of WordPress, shared his thoughts on a powerful philosophy driving Open Source. 

Ecosystem Thinking

Mullenweg introduced the concept of “Ecosystem Thinking,”  a philosophy that drives successful collaborative projects. 

Actual Open Source licenses are the law that guarantees freedom, the bulwark against authoritarianism. But what makes Open Source work isn’t the law, it’s the ethos. It’s the social mores. It’s what I’m now calling Ecosystem Thinking: the mindset that separates any old software with an open source license from the software that’s alive, that’s humming with activity and contributions from a thousand places.” he noted.

This philosophy comprises four essential elements:

  1. Learn: Embrace the beginner’s mindset and constantly engage with new ideas.
  2. Evolve: Apply what you learn to the next iteration, allowing real-world feedback to guide you.
  3. Teach: Teaching others reinforces your own understanding, spreading knowledge throughout the ecosystem.
  4. Nourish: Share the fruits of your success with the broader community to help everyone thrive.

‘Nourish’ is the philosophy behind WordPress’s Five For the Future initiative, where companies and individuals commit a portion of their resources to supporting the WordPress project and ecosystem. This ethos is what keeps Open Source alive and vibrant.

Mislabeling Open Source

He also shared the challenges Open source is facing. Even though Open Source has taken over as an “intellectual and moral movement,… false prophets like Meta are trying to co-opt it.” He referenced Meta’s “open-source” AI model, Llama, as a prime example of this trend.

While LLaMA is free, its license restricts use for companies with over 700 million active users. Mullenweg argued that although Meta has the right to impose such terms, labeling it as “Open Source” misleads the public.

Vote with your Wallet

Mullenweg encouraged the community to “vote with your wallet” by supporting companies that actively contribute to the Open Source ecosystem. He praised organizations like Newfold, Awesome Motive, 10up, Godaddy, Hostinger, and Google but warned of “parasitic entities that just want to feed off the host without giving anything back.”

To make his point, Mullenweg compared the Five For the Future contributions from Automattic and WP Engine, a competitor of similar size. Automattic contributes 3,786 hours per week, while WP Engine contributes just 47.

“Those of us who are makers, who create the source, need to be wary of those who would take our creations and squeeze out the juice. They’re grifters who will hop onto the next fad, but we’re trying to build something big here, something long term—something that lasts for generations,” he said.

Mullenweg urged the community to be mindful of their choices: “Think about that next time it comes up to renew your hosting or domain, weigh your dollars towards companies that give back more, because you’ll get back more, too. Freedom isn’t free.”

This is not the first time Mullenweg has discussed this point. “Those who care about the future of WordPress should spend their dollars with less parasitic companies,” he said in 2022.

6 Comments

6 Comments

  • Author
    Posts
    • Is there a place we can view all the Five For the Future time contributions?

      Reply
    • Thank you for sharing Matt’s insights on Ecosystem Thinking. His emphasis on the ethos and social mores that drive Open Source resonates deeply. It’s inspiring to see how WordPress has created a thriving community built on collaboration and mutual growth.

      One idea that stood out to me is the “Nourish” principle. While initiatives like Five For the Future are a fantastic way to give back, I wonder if there are more ways individuals or smaller companies can contribute meaningfully, especially those who may not have the resources to commit significant time or money.

      What advice would you give to those who want to support the Open Source ecosystem but feel they lack the means to do so? Are there smaller, everyday actions that could make a difference?

      Reply
    • Matt’s concept of ‘Ecosystem Thinking’ perfectly captures the heart of Open Source. The focus on community-driven growth—learning, evolving, teaching, and nourishing—shows that Open Source is about more than just code; it’s about supporting a sustainable, collaborative ecosystem. His call to ‘vote with your wallet’ is a great reminder that where we spend can strengthen companies that truly give back. Powerful insights, Matt—thank you for challenging us to think beyond the software!

      Reply
    • You should be disclosing that Matt Mullenweg owns this website and is the CEO of Automattic when quoting him criticizing a competitor like this.

      If Matt Mullenweg wants other companies to participate more, then WordPress needs to finally implement proper governance. Including not allowing Automattic employees to override WordPress teams, as was a reoccurring problem with the Marketing team before it was shut down, and having an Executive Director of WordPress that is employed by the WordPress Foundation instead of Automattic. A good starting point for that would be to release the conflict of interest policy that the Executive Director had said on multiple occasion was going to be released, but never was.

      Reply
    • Matt’s vision of ecosystem thinking resonates deeply, especially in the open-source world where collaboration and community are at the heart of success. It’s refreshing to see a focus on creating a sustainable and inclusive ecosystem that benefits everyone, from developers to end users.

      I believe one of the key aspects of long-term success in open source is encouraging contribution while maintaining flexibility. Balancing individual creativity with a broader community vision can be challenging, but Matt’s approach highlights how this balance can drive innovation.

      The emphasis on longevity rather than short-term gains is a lesson that many tech leaders could learn from. By nurturing relationships within the ecosystem, we can build stronger foundations for future projects. As someone working in design, this open ecosystem is crucial for fostering new ideas and user-centric solutions.

      What are your thoughts on how we can ensure smaller contributors aren’t overshadowed by larger players in the open-source ecosystem?

      Reply
  • The topic ‘Matt Mullenweg’s Ecosystem Thinking for Open Source Success ’ is closed to new replies.

Newsletter

Subscribe Via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Get updates from WP Tavern

Subscribe now to receive email updates directly in your inbox.

Continue reading