WP Super Cache 1.4.9 Patches Multiple XSS Vulnerabilities

WP Super Cache is a nearly 10-year-old plugin that is maintained by Donncha Ó Caoimh and is actively installed on more than a million sites. Releases have been far and few between, but Ó Caoimh has released WP Super Cache 1.4.9 that patches cross-site-scripting vulnerabilities on the settings page.

“Those pages are only accessible by admin users so an anonymous visitor to your site can’t come along and enable it to steal your login cookies but along with those fixes come many bug fixes so it’s worth upgrading if you’re using an old version,” Ó Caoimh said.

In addition to patching security vulnerabilities, this release also contains a number of bug fixes. There’s also a fix in this version for those who host a lot of sites that use WP Super Cache and are running into issues with semaphores due to the possibility of users using file locking.

If you’re running into this issue and need to disable file locking completely, Ó Caoimh suggests setting the WPSC_DISABLE_LOCKING constant in a global config file. “The file locking simply slowed down how fast cache files were created and is a hold-over from WP Cache when that plugin used to write directly to the cache files,” Ó Caoimh said.

“This plugin writes to temporary files before moving to the final cache files so that locking isn’t really needed, but some sites still use it which is why it’s still around.”

Ó Caoimh is already hard at work on the next version of WP Super Cache with an effort towards moving legacy cache files into supercache directories. This will improve performance and make the files easier to maintain.

Users are encouraged to update to 1.4.9 as soon as possible. To see a detailed list of changes and bug fixes, visit the plugin’s changelog.

2 Comments


  1. Thanks for covering this Jeff! I’m really excited about the changes to legacy caching as it’s powerful but because of the way it was implemented it was hobbled. We have to come up with a better name for it though. WP Cache isn’t even around any more.

    I always find it weird when I’m referred to by my surname in an article, but thankfully it hasn’t happened much.
    Could you edit the post to say “Ó Caoimh” rather than “Caoimh” as the Ó bit is also part of the surname? TIA!

    Report

Comments are closed.