WordPress 2023 Survey: Block Editor on the Rise, Positive Feeling about Contributing Drops

The results of the 2023 WordPress Annual Survey are in, revealing a steady growth in the adoption of the Block Editor, along with a lukewarm response to upcoming Gutenberg enhancements.

Automattic-sponsored contributor Dan Soschin posted a breakdown of the results:

“Overall, awareness and/or use of block-based features is up year over year, as well as resources such as Learn.WordPress.org. This reflects project-wide efforts to increase utilization of these respectively. However, positive sentiment about WordPress is down modestly, and more so among contributors.

The data collected is used as one of many signals that inform the project’s road map and areas of focus, both near and long-term.”

A total of 3,922 people completed this year’s survey, an increase of 17% compared to 2022 but still lower than the goal set by the team. Interestingly, a new metric captured this year shows that approximately 11,153 viewed the survey without answering a question (more on that later).

Below are a few interesting findings from the slimmer-than-usual 54-page report (PDF):

Key findings

  • NPS, measuring responders’ willingness to recommend WordPress, is down, marking a continuous downward trend: 27.9 among contributors and 32 among non-contributors.
  • Most responders use WordPress for business-related activities: 48.8% offer the service to clients, and 43.1% use it to run their business.
  • The majority (39.9%) use the Block editor or Gutenberg plugin, 20.2% use the Classic editor, and 19.9% use both. These figures represent a steady rise in the adoption of the Block editor. However, this year, 12.3% of respondents chose the Other category (likely referring to site builders).
  • As to their satisfaction with the Site Editor, 45.1% said it meets their needs for building websites.
  • 51.7% built websites for others, and 41.9% created a plugin, theme, style variation, or a block pattern.
  • Some activities that saw a significant increase include consuming learning materials on learn.wordpress.org and various types of contributions and involvement with the community: participated in a meetup/WordCamp, contributed to the platform, and joined the Making WordPress Slack.
  • Seeing as most responders develop, design, or maintain WordPress websites, it’s good to see that 61.1% say they are familiar with Block-based themes and plugins.
  • 63.3% think WordPress is as good as, or better than, other site builders and CMSs, down from 68% in 2022. Interestingly, many also regularly use other blogging and newsletter tools to publish content, mainly Medium, Tumblr, and Blogger. The top reasons respondents preferred WordPress were open-source, familiarity, maturity, and cost.
  • The figures above correspond with answers to the question, What’s the best thing about WordPress? where performance, scalability, and accessibility registered a huge spike while parameters like ease of use, flexibility, cost, and block themes dropped significantly.
  • Ranking “essential plugins” out of the 20 most popular ones provides a glimpse into day-to-day use: Yoast SEO, Classic Editor, and WooCommerce were the top three, with None of the above coming fifth, Elementor Website Builder coming at 8th, and two plugins that enable post and page duplication closing the list. Gutenberg is absent.
  • On the other hand, too many plugins were the primary cause of frustration (133% rise from 2022, with too many themes seeing a 72% rise), followed by dissatisfactory site editing, designing, configuring, and publishing experience. The cost complaints, meanwhile, are directed at hosting companies: 7% in 2023 vs. 3% in 2022.
  • 57.5% see phases 3 and 4 of the WordPress roadmap as beneficial for developers, creators, and publishers alike, with the rest either neutral or disagreeing. Performance, security, and developer resources were the top three areas responders wanted the project to focus on, with collaborative editing at the very bottom of the list.
  • Finally, many had poor experiences when contributing to the community, with fewer people feeling welcome to participate in various ways. Asked what prevents you from contributing more, 35.3% cited bad experiences and not feeling safe, welcome, or appreciated.

Mapping the Road Ahead

After reading through the results, one can’t help but notice a certain disconnect between the people who use WordPress and those tasked with maintaining and leading it into the future.

Responders appear less interested in new features than they are in optimizing core functionality and delivering a stable experience; many still find the Site Editor and blocks-based posts overwhelming, holding on to the Classic Editor plugin; and both audiences—extenders and end-users—crave guidance, training, and support.

A chart showing the distribution of answers to question number 10 in the 2023 WordPress Survey, "The WordPress Site Editor meets my needs for building websites". From left to right: 13.4% Strongly disagree, 15.2% Disagree, 26.3% Neutral, 32.6% Agree, 12.5% Strongly agree.

Summarizing the next steps, Soschin mentioned the plan to replace or refine some of the questions “to ensure people continue to provide valuable insight into the project’s trends”.

One possible way is to bring back open-ended questions that could help the team better understand what matters to people.

Looking at the high percentage of people who replied “None of the above” to several questions and the comments to the post inviting WP Tavern readers to participate in the survey, community members seem eager to share their opinions; they’re just frustrated with the format.

Have you participated in the latest annual survey? Share your experience in the comments.

12

12 responses to “WordPress 2023 Survey: Block Editor on the Rise, Positive Feeling about Contributing Drops”

  1. About contributing: (for me personally), getting stuff done is hard. Meaning: the time to get feedback or an approval (or not for that matter) takes many many months.

    This delays the process for you as contributor and takes of some of the joy of contributing to the project.

    I think therefore more core committers could be assigned (or make sure they have more time to spend).

    my 2 cents

    • Hi Anthony,

      Thanks for your comment!

      Speaking as someone who once thought FSE was the worst idea ever, I think the “want and need” part isn’t that clear-cut. 6.5, for example, is full of bug fixes and enhancements for end users and developers.
      WordPress doesn’t seem like a generic feature factory. Guess I’m more optimistic :-)

      • I could talk for hours about this, we build sites for a living and went all in on FSE with a few clients around version 6.2. Huge mistake, we had to resort to shortcodes….. SHORTCODES… in the FSE editor to get a fit for purpose nav working.

        FSE Nav and interface remains poor and ever changing, nothing in 6.5 has changed my mind of that. Watch over a new users shoulder and you’ll see how bamboozled they get.

        An example on wants and need, I want a navigation block that can actually create something more than the most basic of menus.

        What we’re getting is stuff like interactivity API which is on the nice to have lists, but feels odd when extremely basic functionality has remained absent for years now.

        I’m on board with the block editor and FSE but the way the project is run and change is managed, nothing short of a disaster. 5 minutes in the Github issue repo dumpster fire is all you need to realise this.

        Don’t get me started on trying to train users….

    • I second that view. And want to add: When I started working with WP 3 I loved the simplicity and that I could keep users from generating ugly content and there was a easy way to provide a consistent interface even non-technical persons could master with a rather flat learning curve. Now we have a menu hell like when MS started the ever-changing “contextual” menubars and templating is a nightmare of dependencies. To me, WP spun way off a consistently user oriented line since jumping onto the sitebuilder wagon.

      It’s just like every other Open Source project becoming more a tool for people to feel important and therefore the concepts and interfaces have to be endlessly fiddled with, while core problems keep unaddressed for years. It’s as they were not sexy enough on a resume.

      I feel a lock-in with one of my bigger projects, but regarding smaller websites with just one or a handful of users I‘m looking into flat-file CMSs atm. Since the beginning of the „interface revolution“ I feel I cannot recommend WP to small projects anymore, since the efforts to give them what they are able to work with seem to be rising constantly and thus their costs.

  2. Hi,
    your key lines are “disconnect between the people who use WordPress and those tasked with maintaining and leading it into the future.
    Responders appear less interested in new features than they are in optimizing core functionality and delivering a stable experience;”.
    Exactly right. WP leaders seem focused more on “enjoy the experience” instead of worry about basic functionalities that SHOULD be part of the basic package, so that one is forced to install just another plugin to fill the hole, like – to name a few – Adminimize, IfMenu, Wordfence, Anti-spam, XML-CSV Import, login form customization, etc.
    It doesn’t mean much to have a fantastic editing experience when your site can be easily hacked !

  3. Maintaining a stable core and minimizing the reliance on plugins is crucial for the overall health and performance of our websites. As someone deeply involved in accessibility, I appreciate the strides Gutenberg has made in producing more accessible code and content compared to the classic editor. However, it’s concerning that the survey overlooks inquiries about accessibility considerations. Inclusivity should be a fundamental aspect of any web development tool, and I hope future assessments will include questions addressing accessibility concerns.

  4. When I first delved into the world of website creation with WordPress version 3, I was immediately drawn to its simplicity. It offered a user-friendly interface that allowed even non-technical individuals to craft beautiful websites with ease. One of the things I loved most about it was the ability to maintain a consistent look and feel across all pages, ensuring that content remained clean and visually appealing.

    However, as time passed and WordPress evolved, I couldn’t help but notice a shift away from its user-oriented roots. With the introduction of site builders and the ever-changing landscape of menus and interfaces, WordPress began to feel cluttered and overwhelming. It seemed like every update brought with it a new set of complexities, making templating a nightmare of dependencies and customizations.

    It’s reminiscent of Microsoft’s introduction of “contextual” menu bars, where the simplicity of the interface was sacrificed in favor of endless customization options. The core problems that users faced remained unaddressed, while the platform itself became more focused on catering to developers and those looking to make a name for themselves in the tech world.

    For someone like me, who values simplicity and consistency in website design, this shift in focus has been disheartening. It feels like WordPress has strayed from its original mission of providing an accessible platform for everyone, regardless of their technical expertise.

    As a result, I’ve found myself exploring alternative options, particularly flat-file CMSs, for smaller projects. These platforms offer a return to simplicity, with straightforward interfaces and minimal dependencies. They provide everything a small website needs without the added complexity and overhead that comes with WordPress.

    While I still feel somewhat locked into WordPress for larger projects, I can no longer wholeheartedly recommend it for smaller endeavors. The constant effort required to keep up with its ever-evolving interface and features has made it less accessible and more costly for those just starting out.

    In conclusion, the evolution of WordPress has been a double-edged sword. While it has introduced new features and capabilities, it has also strayed from its user-oriented origins, becoming increasingly complex and unwieldy in the process. For those looking for simplicity and ease of use, it may be time to explore alternative options that better align with their needs and values.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Newsletter

Subscribe Via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Discover more from WP Tavern

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading