1. Scott Kingsley Clark

    I built a search plugin for this very reason, but of course like Matt said, you can’t control a lot of things on the user’s site, so my plugin doesn’t work well on shared hosting for larger sites.

    Something I built into my plugin, and would want to see available in a future solution, would be some ability for it to take into consideration the actual markup/output used for the content. This way, it could automatically build relevancy on specific keywords per page and take into account other content on that page which may not strictly be in post_content or the title. Display of custom fields is also important, because it’s not jus the data, there could be templating stuff that is essentially invisible to plugins that only look at meta.

    Anyways, I don’t have a ton of time to work on my search plugin any more, I’m focusing on Pods mostly. But I know that when I get some more time, I’ll be looking into a few more updates, but I hope a better solution comes out so I don’t have to spread myself too thin.


  2. Jeffro

    @Scott Kingsley Clark – Well, the more I look into it, the more it makes sense to offload all of the resource heavy searching to the cloud via a service and just use the plugin to provide the functionality and different methods of searching which seems to be exactly what the VIP search addon with Elastic provides. The last thing I want to do is have good search but take down my site and upset my webhost lol.


  3. Scott Kingsley Clark

    @Jeffro – Right, and that makes sense to cover most cases there, as opposed to maybe the developer crowd who have better hosting and would prefer better plugins/built-in stuff as opposed to the third-party service.

    The VIP search isn’t available for .org users (yet) though, so there’s still much to be desired there.


  4. Luke Francl

    I work for Swiftype, which provides a cloud search plugin for WordPress.

    We definitely see the advantage of off-loading search to another server. Plugins that use your local database like Relevanssi can’t handle lots of posts, whereas we have customers with hundreds of thousands of posts happily using our service. Additionally, we give you nice search analytics and the ability to change result rankings by dragging and dropping.

    If you’re not on VIP (or if you are — our plugin is VIP-approved), give Swiftype a look. It’s free for small sites.


  5. Chuck Reynolds

    Seems Luke beat me to it but I was going to mention swiftype.com as we’ve used that on a couple sites before and are happy with the results. I’ve used all the others too and I’ll stick with them for now.
    And just to throw it out there… G. custom search is a horrible experience for users.


  6. Ajay

    Do you think having better search functionality in WordPress is worth paying for? Have you installed any plugins or have manually improved the search capabilities on your website?

    WordPress’ biggest lacking feature till date is an advanced search feature. However, paying for search would largely depend on if you’re making enough money from your blogs to justify the extra cost.

    Then again if you’re a huge blog, “outsourcing” your search requirements makes sense.

    I use my own plugin “Better Search” – https://wordpress.org/extend/plugins/better-search/ on my sites which uses mySQL’s FULLTEXT index.


  7. Ryan Duff

    Looks like you didn’t dig far enough… While elasticsearch requires its own server to run, there is also a hosted service that offers the same thing.


    Searchbox.io offers free plans with paid plans for more indexing and storage.

    They even have their own WordPress plugin (http://searchbox-io.github.io/wp-elasticsearch/) which integrates elasticsearch into your WordPress install quite easily.


  8. Drew Jaynes

    At the least, core needs to base search on relevancy, something I think there’s at least a couple of existing tickets for. Something like this would be fantastic, but as Ryan said above, elasticsearch is a hosted service, which is quite the barrier to adoption.


  9. Matt Orley

    I’ve tried relevanssii, but have moved on to Google Custom Search for projects that need it.

    I’ve integrated YahooBOSS for a joomla search (lots (>10) of parsable results), but haven’t rammed that through WP yet.


  10. Rob Lawrence

    I’ve been using the plugins “relevanssi” and “dave’s live search” and they work well together, but have noticed a bit of a lag and slowness sometimes (especially when waiting for the “live search” to pop in. My site http://www.membershipexpert.com isn’t too large, a few hundreds articles and not a lot of videos or audios yet, just plain text, but you can tell the WordPress search is struggling a bit under the load. I don’t blame any one plugin but when you’re running many plugins (30 or more), sites can slow significantly under the strain. Offloading the search seems like a great idea and is one less thing to tax your server.


  11. Jeffro

    Thanks for the comments guys. It looks like I have my hands full with a couple of search alternatives to try out and review


  12. Scott Kingsley Clark

    @Jeffro – I’ve been testing out the external Swiftype Search service for the new Pods site. It seems to do a really great job out of the box. No support for custom fields though, but you can choose whether to index pages of content or use their WordPress plugin and index only the content of the post. Their indexer has some custom meta tags you can use to pop your extra content into for indexing too.


  13. Chris Scott

    My company developed Lift Search which may be of interest: http://getliftsearch.com/ which uses Amazon’s CloudSearch to index and search posts. The plugin is free, but you do pay for CloudSearch (typically $90/month).


  14. Mathew Porter

    I have a client that uses swiftype.com’s solution and like the ease and customisation.

    Personally for my blog I dont need the search functionality, but may do as the content expands.


  15. Matthew Boynes

    I developed the search integration for kff.org. If you have any questions about that specifically, let me know, and I’ll be happy to answer what I can!


  16. Ted Clayton

    Jeffro notes:

    It was also mentioned that most of the [intensive search] functionality can be achieved using Google Custom Search. In fact, Matt Mullenwegs personal WordPress site Ma.tt runs Google Custom Search.

    I wonder if that reflects that Matt prefers the Google service; that he is steering regular WordPress users to a practical solution, or is sparing the environment/farm on which his domain resides.

    Caching and pre-indexing are helpful. At one time, it was rather common for document-search facilities to pre-index. Once the simple term-indexing is done, then more elaborate search-strategies can work off the indexes.

    WordPress caching plugins routinely cache search-results. An appropriately regulated background indexer could make the cache into a more-overt/robust search-enhancement.

    Fancy searches do require additional levels of involvement … and of course, for many folks & enterprises, the off-site cloud-based search-service [see: Review – Swiftype Search Plugin] is just the ticket.

    For some folks & situations, though, there can be attractions & values in taking a more hands-on approach with search-functionalities. It becomes a database & data-processing undertaking: indexes of terms found within the site form the data, and query-facilities process it and return hits (taking input from the advance search interface).

    A search of WordPress Extend using ‘sqlite + cache’ returns 4 plugin titles, 2 that look interesting.


Comments are closed.

%d bloggers like this: