8 Comments

  1. Chip Bennett

    Thanks for the shout-out, Jeff! Just FYI, I’m posting revisions here as I update the diagram. I think the third revision should be just about at the spit-and-polish stage…

    Report

  2. Ryan

    Thanks for the hard work Chip!

    Report

  3. John Blackbourn

    Chip I think your comment system swallowed my comment (no feedback after posting it) so I’ll post it here.

    Good work Chip! This is a really nice improvement.

    There’s an error though (looking at rev 3). The is_tax() conditional isn’t true for category and tag archives as the diagram states. The “Taxonomy Archive” block should be removed, and the “Category Archive”, “Tag Archive”, and “Custom Taxonomy Archive” blocks should be moved up to the same level as “Date Archive”, “Author Archive” and “Custom Post Type Archive”.

    Also the “Custom Post Type Archive” block can have “post-type-archive post-type-archive-$posttype” added for its body classes.

    John

    Report

  4. Rev. Voodoo

    Yup, same thing happened to me on your site Chip, no feedback on commenting. Was stating that I send people to the diagram very frequently from the forums, and VoodooPress. Your diagram is far better than the word chart I had running, which was only one step up from a cocktail napkin. Much appreciate the effort!

    Report

  5. Chip Bennett

    @John Blackbourn

    There’s an error though (looking at rev 3). The is_tax() conditional isn’t true for category and tag archives as the diagram states.

    Oh, dear! Thanks for pointing that out. I inferred that from the is_tax() Codex page, which just states “Taxonomy” as opposed to custom taxonomy, and which also lists all of the core-registered taxonomies.

    (Note to self: update is_tax() Codex page to clarify.)

    The “Taxonomy Archive” block should be removed, and the “Category Archive”, “Tag Archive”, and “Custom Taxonomy Archive” blocks should be moved up to the same level as “Date Archive”, “Author Archive” and “Custom Post Type Archive”.

    Sure enough! Fixed in my working copy.

    Report

  6. Chip Bennett

    @John and @Rev: your comments are approved; thanks for the heads-up. I’ll try to figure out why the lack of feedback on-submit.

    Also: just added Rev 4, which addresses comments from John, Nacin, and others.

    Report

  7. Chuck Reynolds

    nice… very much needed update. good job so far – like it

    Report

  8. matt mcinvale

    thanks chip! very much appreciated.

    Report

Comments are closed.

%d bloggers like this: