In reply to Otto.

I’m aware of this, but I’m not a designer. I only ever looked at the function. I’m a terrible designer. I know my limits.
Otto - I was active and vocal months ago about how unusable I felt the "read more" links were. That discussion was mostly on make, before there were really trac threads, but then did move into trac.

The summary was as beautiful as the new design looked, many over the course of months voiced frustration over the usability/layout issues with the biggest by far being the switch from tabs to "read more" links.

I banged my head in chorus with others against the .org wall as long as a could before I gave up and went away. From Mark it sounded like maybe their might be a design iteration with tabs, that never came that I saw.

Let me say however that I never once saw your voice in those discussions, and wouldn't really expect to hear your voice
in design discussions. Perhaps people are confusing you with Sam Sidler who was in that discussion and was the one talking "80/20" and dismissing the opinions expressed on make and trac as being from "developers not users".

So, Yay! There is a new backend and search that is a huge accomplishment, props on that.

But, Boo! Design feedback from the community was summarily ignored. The best we got in response was "you were heard we just decided not to make any changes". You can _not_ look through all those old threads and not see that 99% of the comments were against the "Read more" links, yet, that's what we ended up with with no alternatives ever presented.