I think this all comes down to double standards. Specifically around the cost of a camp and in return the level of sponsorships.

I just responded to Aaron who was responding to my post with this quote:

“A WordCamp is a low-cost or no-cost event, usually held on a weekend where WordPress enthusiasts can get together to meet one another, and learn more about how to get the most out of WordPress. ”

and I was forced to do some quick math to put things into perspective:

Based on the existing sponsorship packages, assuming 1 sponsor at each level, you're looking at $64,500 price tag just with sponsors. Not including 12,000 in ticket sales assuming 600 attendees at the Foundation recommended $20 a head for a one-day event.

Again, assuming 1 sponsor at each level. The foundation has been pretty forthcoming to all the organizers when they feel our budgets are too high, I would imagine that its only right that the community by the checks and balances for the foundation as well and pull out the red card when appropriate.

I also think it comes down to name. If a WordCamp is defined and they must follow specific rules, than San Francisco is no different, regardless of who's name is behind it or the history. I can name a number of cities whose follow ship is growing and who could easily demand same levels of sponsorship.

When you do this, you inadvertently tell the community (communities) that you are not too worried about their problems. You essentially recognize the challenges presented by the guidance, but really don't care as it doesn't affect you. This is where dissension in the ranks begins and where divides and rumors start.

Just my humble opinion.