In reply to Peter Shaw.

If we allow events to kill people because they consented with the so called risks, then invite the politicians to the discussion: I want to ask why our states for decades do not allow tourism to access nuclear plant without appropriate equipment.🤔 If I consent to the risks involved, why can’t I visit nuclear plants at the weekend, right? Why can’t I allow Google to steal all metadata from me? “If I gave them my consent, they should be able to treat me as much as a product as I want, and not the contrary.”, that’s the line of thought in which your argument is. 😨Why not allow people to jump from planes if they consent? Much more possibilities to euthanasia… You see, I just switched the objects and subjects from your argument: a world of possibilities your argument is not so far from. May the world never reach it, I pray. It is not meetups and wordcamps that need to offer consent. Just wait for the vaccines, if they work: good, as expected. For now, encouraging events rather than encouraging protection from a lethal and uncommon disease is a decision, and the reason why we are eternally sick is because some people lobby for googles, nuclear plants, covid… I don’t know if I was clear enough. I don’t have much time to write. I hope to be readable. I am trying to show you what you didn’t see (because no one sees everything) when saying that ‘running meetups would not be unconscious’. Would be conscious to desires and for the ego, but it would be unconscious to the conscience ruling your body, yes.