In reply to doris.

That is what happens with fixing things on the fly, I imagine. Please focus on resolving this issue before doing anything with 6.3. Yes, it may be different people, but their skills could be better used for fixing 6.2, right? For the good of the project, of the community? More time in beta is a good thing; more issues can be found before we amateurs are faced with something above our pay grade—and as much as developers might like the income from fixing broken sites, we all would prefer to be creating new things (and grassroots groups like mine, with part-time volunteers only, cannot afford a professional and struggle to keep up).