In reply to Ted Clayton.

I've been thinking a lot about your point : "Calling what is done here “validation”, and then asserting that “security and code-quality” objectives have been achieved, is overstating what it is & does. This terminology & claim poses the service as something more-authoritative than it is."

I mostly agree with your point of view. Some claims definitly need to be adapted. This service is meant to be trustable, and as such, it should not over-promise what it does. However, the main goal of themecheck.org is to offer an easy and quick service. So, the claims also need to be easily understandable... We're working on it.

As it's been said here, the service is new and we need time to adjust it, in a better way for everyone.

People's remarks on this page are of great help.