In reply to Rick Gregory.

Hi Matt, I also didn't mean to imply that people who provide .org services shouldn't be paid. The problem seems to be that WordPress has morphed into a confusing array of services, at least to the average Joe. It rather quickly, and unexpectantly, went from a free and easy to use blog platform, to a for-free and also for-profit CMS that is one of the most confusing and demanding applications out there. It also requires more plug-ins and add-ons to use than the majority of other applications. For Matt and others, WP seems to have become a two-headed monster (for-free .org vs. for-profit .com). So it wouldn't surprise me if .com or .org are rebranded so .com can more effectively compete with services like Squarespace. WP isn't a freemium model, so maybe it doesn't make sense for them to share the same brand name. But then again, maybe WP could/should switch to some kind of a freemium model?