In reply to Ashutosh Mishra.

Hello!
Why do you think the terms whitelist and blacklist need to go?

It seems they are not related to human races at all. They just use "black vs white" analogy just like "light vs dark".
Supposedly the freemasons needed unanimity to allow a new member to join. So they all expresed their vote with white balls for positive and black balls for negative (again, nothing to do with race). If only one of them voted negative, it's said the aspirant was "black-balled". I don't think that's even the origin of the symbolic use of these colors. Black hides and White exposes. That's literally what a blacklist and whitelists are. All in the blacklist stays in the dark, hidden, forbidden. While in the white they are allowed and visible. It's just an ancient concept not related to race at all .

I found very disgusting try to link everything to racism nowadays after the society is conmotioned by a brutal and unfair police crime. If the victim was white, is as unfair as this. I know, you'll say "if he would've been white the police wouldnt have killed him"... so what? This police officer was a racist or had a bias/prejudging towards black people, that doesn't make this crime worse that the very same crime, without the race issue. It's horrible one way or another.
Trying to link everything with racism is more racist in the end