With all the talk about the 490k sites that have Gutenberg installed, and that being the "great decider" why Gutenberg must be forced upon the world... why isn't anyone concerned that, even the "official gutenberg stats" point out that WAY less than half of those sites have even USED gutenberg to write a post. How do I figure that?

If 490K sites have Gutenberg installed and there have been 290k posts written. That means that 200k of the sites installed gutenberg have never used it. And at the same time, you can't really have anyone believe that all 290k of the posts came from 290k sites. We all know how early adoter systems work. The small minority takes up a large portion of the usage statistics. So I would venture to say that less than 100k sites have even used the plugin (that assumption would basically say a site writes 3 posts.) But what if we assume that those that are actively using Gutenberg have written 10 posts each... that means only 29k sites are using gutenberg. And if we were to say that those "early adopters" have written 30 posts each using the plugin... then we are at less than 10,000 sites actually using Gutenberg...

And at the same time... 400K+ have installed Classic Editor in the attempt to block Gutenberg and preserve the writing workflow that exists. So tell me this. 400K sites vs 10K sites... which is more persuasive.