In reply to Lucas Karpiuk.

Lucas, to be fair to Matt, he may well not have had enough knowledge of the things that WPF's legal representation was undertaking to have a comment.

I swear that's not a snarky statement, in any way. It's fact that WPF applied for the trademark that I objected to in November of last year. It's fact that I owned the domains in question before that, and it's pretty obvious that WP should have applied for the trademark in question long ago.

It's also fact that I tried to work this out with Matt directly a while back (i.e., I emailed him and received no response), and while I think he should have responded I'll sure give him a break on the simple idea that CEOs often let things like this get resolved by the high-priced attorneys they hire to resolve things like this.

I'd love if Matt took a more active part in this conversation, too, but ... well, we'll see.