Thanks Andrew and Jeff, that was a really enlightening interview.

I'm not sure of the ins and outs of TinyMCE, but it seems to me that a lot of it's downfalls are being blamed on the browsers (such as Firefox and the image insertion.) Is this a chicken and egg situation? It is hard to judge where the fault lies on whether TinyMCE should take browser interpretation into account or whether the browser is correctly implementing code.

I think the same also applies to the functions being the same as they work in Writer and Word. Just because these are original functions, does it mean that they are the best way to do it? I think that it is strange to base a visual HTML editor on desktop publishing software, as the nature of the content is entirely different.

Thanks for including my questions, Jeff.