In reply to Terence Milbourn.

The only time that I've ever heard someone refer to it as the "suppository" has been in this comment thread. It's hard to take an argument seriously when a method of debate is glorified name-calling.

I am genuinely curious, however: how many people would actually support Automattic taking control of the .org side and the non-profit. I don't think that it would put an end to the criticism, but instead make new criticisms.