@DrewAPicture, how is offering a paid subscription to generate a source code index/documentation microsite any different from an open source vendor not charging for their premium product/source, but charging for documentation/support? It is no different.

To assert that I'm somehow capitalizing on documentation contributors is laughable-- if you recall, since you and I spoke in person about this roughly a year ago, I'm parsing source code, not documentation. Yes, now the data I gather is augmented by the community's documentation work, but is not based on it. Again, Hookr predates any effort by the community to document WordPress Core... so how you feel slighted is beyond me.

In terms of "friction," I find it ironic that you use phrases such as, "unwillingness to contribute back to the official effort," when in fact, in person at WCNYC2014, I personally offered to help you & the official code reference, yet heard nothing. In fact, my parting words were "get ahold of me."

The root of the problem is that Hookr can provide useful information, whether or not the source is documented, and you/community inner circle somehow feel undermined by this. There is no perfect solution, especially when it comes to what we are trying to do. That being said, source code & documentation are symbiotic; you need both to be truly valuable. However, source code can be unit tested & validated, documentation cannot.

So, I will publicly offer my help (again). If you want to work together on getting the official code reference to where it should be, let me know. Until that time, I will continue providing useful information in a format that is easy to consume for all things WordPress, not just core.

Cheers.