The GB team continues to make bad things worse. A guy writes a detailed review of his experience with the new page editor.

https://wordpress.org/support/topic/all-your-editors-are-belong-to-us/

Samuel Wood replies and the reviewer tries to continue the discussion... which isn't a discussion according to Samuel:

I was not “answering” you in any way, I was just making notes. Then I shared my notes. You’re free to ignore them if you like.

What's a normal person going to think when he reads Samuel's replies to people coming with valid criticisms of the non-standard GB user interface?

Having one of Tammie's bot replies in that thread instead of Samuel's arrogance would have been much better, because she doesn't keep digging herself (and the whole GB team) deeper.

ps: should I perhaps archive that page in case the GB team decides to remove the review and its replies? It's important that normal people see how the GB team deals with opinions that differ from their own.