In reply to Davis Shaver.

If the audit is performed by personnel from the same team/organization that’s building Gutenberg, then it’s most definitely not independent and cannot be considered objective. On the hand, there’s the option of using the classic editor plugin until accessibility is truly ready. In some parts of the economy accessibility is required by law. This will put undo stress on some .gov and .org web admins.

I feel that Gutenberg is the future, it’s just not ready for prime time.