In reply to Otto.

@Otto, I obviously can't comment on the nature of the correspondence you receive, because I haven't seen it. But I did read Peter's original review, and there is no way that it fits the definition of a "manifesto."

It was, in fact, a careful, step-by-step account of the problems that he found when trying to use Gutenberg and how, despite being a developer, he found that normal methods of debugging were essentially blocked by the architectural choices made by the GB team.

I would argue that Peter's was actually a model review -- I certainly learned things from it -- and the fact that it was "archived" makes it very clear that to me that the moderation process on the Gutenberg plugin is badly flawed.