In reply to dnavarrojr.

LOL.. That's funny.

Again, the end of the article asked, "What do you think of Twenty Sixteen?".

Now you come along and say people shouldn't share what they think if it isn't what you think it should be? Too late.. FYI - the question wasn't "What do you think of Twenty Sixteen? And oh by the way, only comment if it's not criticism."

It has been my experience, seeing many people who have been dismissed by core contributors as not being qualified to enter discussions (including myself), I wouldn't bother attempting again.

But, thanks for the smile. I enjoyed it.

FWIW, many of us have, in fact, done a significant amount of contributing in many ways, albeit not in core. And in my case, I don't bother approaching anything "core" due to their attitudes, not mine.

I think there needs to be more, much more involvement in criticizing what is presented. That IS part of the process, or it should be.

We don't all agree, and I for one am tired of those who seem to believe that we must all act like we agree in order to be welcomed.

If you believe that because there are people who are expressing their dislike for something (or are attempting to give some rather good, constructive criticism) means they haven't attempted to participate, then I disagree with your evaluation.