The intent of the “good people” is to crack down on all speech that is not in line with the officially endorsed and allowed view on any matter, giving the government the power to regulate (ban) and criminalize it. That’s why they label it “hate” and “misinformation”.

The logical, and obviously wrong, consequence of your unconstitutional reasoning is this: If people choose to say the wrong things on the corporate social products, why should they be permitted to have their own website and email anyone freely? That is the opposite of what we want: silencing threats to public safety and prosecuting criticism of the administration and other types of domestic terrorism.