In reply to Poena.

First, I would like to thank WPTRT for their reviews of my themes, because of which I'm a better developer today.

Some rules felt like you were unnecessarily holding back the theme.
I came to understand the significance and reasons behind some rules later in my career.

With the new reviewers it felt like they were trying to impress someone by finding faults in the themes with a magnifying glass.

1. My theme used to have a slider, it had Steve Jobs picture in one of the slide. Some reviewer complained about it.

2. Some one had to dig through the TOS (which even our paying customers barely check, even after prominently linking to it) listed on our website to find fault with the submission.

Whether the above two cases were right or wrong is not the point here. The general attitude of the reviewers (the new joines) is not right towards the theme authors and the themes.

And titles like "WPTRT Cracking down on so and so" doesn't make things any better.

Also most of the rules are mostly written in rock. At least that is how they are treated by new reviewers.

I recently developed a theme using Hybrid framework, and bundled functionality not in hybrid into a second framework.
This resulted in two name spaces for the frameworks and one for the actual theme code.

When I if this will be allowed, the answer is no.