In reply to Peter Cralen (@PeterCralen).

Hi Peter,

I wrote a similar post to Mika's over at my site, and the gist of the comments that I provided is that not only are you not protecting your content, and not only are you making it impossible for users of assistive technology like myself to enjoy your site, you are also opening yourself up to some not-so-positive word-of-mouth exposure. If one of using assistive technology has a problem with your site, and especially if your site then comes up in conversation with other AT users, we're going to relay our experiences to those we're in conversation with. Who are then going to relay that experience to other AT users. And the word spreads. Further, people who are close to us or who work with us on a daily basis and see the impact this sort of problem has on us will also not visit your site, buy your products, ETC. So yeah, this kind of copy protection does a lot more harm than good.