In reply to KTS915.

I can see that. And how long would you wait? I assume you would just keep assessing the risk until you felt it was sufficiently weighted in favor of making the update. But it seems that this particular error is an anomaly and so automatically updating would be an extremely low-risk proposition, especially in light of the amount of effort expended in monitoring and assessing each update. As in previous discussions, perhaps the "option" would be a good idea, but I think most users would prefer to set it and forget it. JMHO.